>
>
FAO Versus JAO Matters Remanded Back To HC : CASE COMPILATION & LITIGATION GUIDE

FAO Versus JAO Matters Remanded Back To HC : CASE COMPILATION & LITIGATION GUIDE

299.00 + GST

The reassessment controversy under the Income-tax Act, 1961 has entered a decisive stage after the Supreme Court remanded multiple FAO vs JAO matters back to various High Courts for fresh adjudication in light of the retrospective insertion of Section 147A by the Finance Act, 2026.

This E-Magazine titled “FAO Versus JAO Matters Remanded Back To HC: Case Compilation & Litigation Guide”is a comprehensive research and litigation resource designed for tax advocates, chartered accountants, litigation professionals, departmental representatives, academicians, and taxpayers dealing with reassessment proceedings under Sections 147, 148, 148A, 151A, and related provisions.

- +
Add to WishlistAdd to Compare
Category: Tags: , ,

The reassessment controversy under the Income-tax Act, 1961 has entered a decisive stage after the Supreme Court remanded multiple FAO vs JAO matters back to various High Courts for fresh adjudication in light of the retrospective insertion of Section 147A by the Finance Act, 2026.

This E-Magazine titled “FAO Versus JAO Matters Remanded Back To HC: Case Compilation & Litigation Guide”is a comprehensive research and litigation resource designed for tax advocates, chartered accountants, litigation professionals, departmental representatives, academicians, and taxpayers dealing with reassessment proceedings under Sections 147, 148, 148A, 151A, and related provisions.

The publication provides an in-depth analysis of the ongoing dispute between Faceless Assessing Officers (FAOs) and Jurisdictional Assessing Officers (JAOs) regarding the validity of reassessment notices issued after implementation of the faceless reassessment regime introduced through the Finance Act, 2021.

This E-Magazine includes detailed coverage of landmark rulings delivered by the Bombay High Court, Rajasthan High Court, Telangana High Court, Delhi High Court, Gujarat High Court, and the Supreme Court of India. It explains how several High Courts quashed reassessment notices issued by JAOs on the ground that reassessment proceedings were required to be conducted exclusively through the faceless mechanism under Section 151A and the Faceless Reassessment Scheme.

The guide also analyses the retrospective insertion of Section 147A through the Finance Act, 2026, which seeks to validate reassessment proceedings initiated by jurisdictional officers. It examines the constitutional, statutory, and procedural implications arising from retrospective validation and the Supreme Court’s remand order dated 10 April 2026.

Key Features of the E-Magazine

  • Detailed analysis of FAO vs JAO jurisdictional dispute
  • Supreme Court remand order explained in simple language
  • Comprehensive compilation of High Court judgments
  • Analysis of Sections 147, 148, 148A, 147A, 151A, 144B, 120, and 124
  • Coverage of retrospective amendment introduced by Finance Act, 2026
  • Litigation strategies for assessees and tax advocates
  • Constitutional issues involving Article 14 and retrospective legislation
  • Research-based practical guide for reassessment litigation
  • Important judicial observations and legal principles
  • Useful for drafting writ petitions, replies, and legal submissions

Who Should Read This?

  • Tax Advocates
  • Chartered Accountants
  • Tax Litigation Professionals
  • Corporate Tax Teams
  • Law Firms
  • Tax Consultants
  • Academicians and Researchers
  • Assessees facing reassessment proceedings

Why This E-Magazine Is Important

The FAO versus JAO controversy impacts thousands of reassessment notices across India. With High Courts now reconsidering the issue after the Supreme Court’s remand order, understanding the legal framework, judicial precedents, and possible defence strategies has become crucial for effective reassessment litigation.

This E-Magazine acts as a complete litigation companion by combining case compilation, statutory interpretation, constitutional analysis, and practical advocacy strategies in a single resource.

 

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “FAO Versus JAO Matters Remanded Back To HC : CASE COMPILATION & LITIGATION GUIDE”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Start typing and press Enter to search

Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.